User talk:Stars of 85

October 2014

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Tits— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 14:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That was a test, I never meant to save it, just preview it. Either way I should have self-reverted. Very sorry. --Stars of 85 (talk) 17:47, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Stars of 85. You have new messages at Amortias's talk page.
Message added 18:48, 19 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Amortias (T)(C) 18:48, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Atheism

The links work fine without the extensions and, as explained, there is absolutely no change to the output. So, the page looks identical to any reader regardless. DrKiernan (talk) 16:45, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Right you are. --Stars of 85 (talk) 16:46, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

240p

Actually, it is not an obsolete format. It is a non existent format as the 240 line system was never a digital format. If it had of been it would be 226p in that it had 226 active lines, 86.153.28.37 (talk) 09:21, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on Azealia Banks

Hi, I was taking a look at your edit on Azealia Banks and realised that you have put a speedy deletion tag on it. However, the page was a legitimate (before a user blanked it), so the better thing to do is to revert their edit and leave them a warning. Thanks and happy editing! Darylgolden^(talk) 13:28, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh shit! All I saw was an article that said "HI!" and it never occurred to me to check out whether the article was already created beforehand. Ordinarily that is what I would have done but judgment here lapsed. Thanx for the tip-off! Stars of 85 (talk) 13:30, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]